Talk:The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

New Zealand High‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: New Zealand / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the New Zealand cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Middle-earth Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Plot summary

Why is the plot summary on this page that of the whole trilogy? 66.30.134.255 (talk) 06:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

27 Animals Died

Isn't that worth any mention in the article? http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/27-animals-died-during-filming-of-hollywood-blockbuster-the-hobbit-an-unexpected-journey-says-report-8965357.html http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/11/27/the-hobbit-animal-cruelty-filming_n_4349741.html 178.12.107.144 (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see The Hobbit (film series)#Alleged animal abuse.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure that thousands of ants, flies, spiders and possibly several birds sucked in to jet engines died. All in the making of this and any other film... Talk about stating the obvious?81.107.245.123 (talk) 00:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

high fantasy ??

A high fantasy film?? What is that? and do we need another genere?--Ezzex (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this, although it's the first time I have heard of it. I think the lead should just go with common terms i.e. fantasy/thriller/horror etc, so I would advocate dropping the "high". Betty Logan (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Besides high fantasy already implies that its adventure related. So there's no need for both.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

60 years. Not 77

The film is set sixty years before The Lord of the Rings. Not seventy-seven. 5.80.157.57 (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why is someone deleting the note in reception that the movie has an 83% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes?

That is an easily checked and verified fact ( 83% positive audience rating, rated by over 250,00 audience members, as recorded on the Rotten Tomatoes site), and it has been the case form most of the entire 12 years since the film first aired. It is certainly relevant for anyone seeking information about how the film was received by audiences, so why does it keep getting deleted when it's such a highly pertinent detail? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:4102:C2D0:51C9:5F3:4A0B:3D8E (talk) 04:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]