Talk:Freesound

The website appears to be down. Anyone have any more info? --75.161.147.9 22:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sampling Plus License

Sampling plus looks pretty non free as a license. Secretlondon 14:23, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that the "sampling plus" license is not totally unrestricted, however many licenses are considered "free enough". Note that there is also a Creative_Commons_License#Other_licenses "noncommercial sampling plus" that is more explicit about commercial use. -- Bovineone 18:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well its' not free enough to use in wikipedia, and fails the definition of free cultural works. We can't add the sounds to free software as they are not free enough either. The fact that there are worse licenses (such as CC-NC-ND) doesn't change that. Secretlondon 02:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT GO TO FREESOUND

WARNING: FREESOUND HAS BEEN COMPROMISED!

SOMEBODY HACKED THE SITE, AND NOW IT REDIRECTS TO A ROGUE AV SITE. DO NOT GO ON FREESOUND! Warning: Vandals will be banhammered on sight. A message from the CVU. Chairsenses(Talk) 14:56, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 16:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Freesound Project → Freesound – As can be seen from the Freesound website, the name Freesound Project is no longer used, and the site now calls itself simply Freesound. Zundark (talk) 12:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.