Talk:The Battle of Midway (film)

Military history: War films / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Film: Documentary / War / American Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Editing

This needs to be edited. I have not seen the film, but Japan did not even have 34 battleships in WWII, so I doubt if the film says they lost that many at Midway. Aspie1 23:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the Japanese only lost the 4 carriers and maybe a cruiser or two. If this is an inaccuracy or exaggeration on the part of the film then it should be mentioned 69.226.238.202 02:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]