Talk:The Abolition of Britain

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Labour Party (UK)#"New Labour"|New Labour]] The anchor (#"New Labour") is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Author involvement?

The author of 'The abolition of Britain' has almost certainly worked on this Wikipedia entry. I would, however, be pleased to be corrected on this point. Thank you, Valentine Hayes signed in as New Canadian 14:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No 'almost certainly' about it, Val old chap. The word is 'certainly'.My identifier as 'Clockback should be on it, since I was logged in as such when I wrote it. If it's not, then I have no idea why not. Once again it seemed to me we might as well get the facts right from the start. Peter Hitchens, logged in as Clockback 15:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You were identified only by an IP address, hence my 'almost' qualification. Wikipedia has this unfortunate habit of logging people out under certain conditions, while leaving them with the impression that they are still logged on. This bug has been reported but not, as yet, resolved. There was little room for doubt about your writing style, though! New Canadian 02:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delighted to hear it's so distinctive. Perhaps you'd care to 'balance' it with your own contributions. I'm afraid the original summary was so, er, lacking ( it even failed to spell 'Chatterley' correctly and gave the British edition its US subtitle and vice versa)that I couldn't leave it alone. I'm in a way rather flattered that so many people who haven't read this book have strong opinions on it. This isn't a sufficient condition for classic status, of course, which I don't claim, but it seems to be a necessary one. Peter Hitchens logged in as Clockback 10:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notwithstanding the author's authorship of this article, it doesn't sound totally unreasonable to me. However, I have removed the "criticism" section which I feel focuses too much upon central heating and other tangential issues, rather than describing the full spectrum of responses. Also I have removed the tag, but please restore it if you disagree. Laurence Boyce 14:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editions

Is there any difference in content between the US and British edition? 86.16.47.249 21:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a new preface and a glossary of some British terms unfamiliar to American readers. Peter Hitchens logged in as Clockback 17:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Abolition Of Britain Cover UK ed.jpg

Image:The Abolition Of Britain Cover UK ed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Abolition Of Britain Cover US ed.jpg

Image:The Abolition Of Britain Cover US ed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Marr quote

There is no web reference for the Marr quote -- the quote is taken from Andrew Marr's Observer review which appeared, presumably, in 1999, but it would be great if someone could give an exact reference for this (newspaper date, etc.)The quote is too good not to include. Jprw (talk) 14:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on The Abolition of Britain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]