Talk:Thacker Pass lithium mine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thacker Pass lithium mine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 365 days

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Litigation section(s)

Avatar317, is your intention to merge the litigation section (now 'tribes and litigation') with the regulatory approval section? That's fine with me. Right now, it's a little unclear why litigation is in two separate sections, because the lawsuits have all been consolidated. It just seems a little confusing to spread it between two different sections the way it is now. But it does make sense (because the lawsuits are essentially about permitting) to merge those sections if that's what you'd like to do.Larataguera (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what I think would be a better structure for the article. I only moved two paragraphs because I thought that those looked good, but that the rest of the litigation section could benefit from some consolidation and trimming of what appears to be Original Research WP:OR: (for example: "The 320-acre colony (130 ha) has been the center of a decades-long fight..." appears to be OR beyond the scope of this article) but I did not have the time to work through that section. It could be moved first and trimmed/improved later as well. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 00:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it could use a lot of trimming. It's possible some of it could move to the background section if it isn't actually OR, but a lot of it needs to go. And there are too many primary sources. Hope you get a chance to move it sometime soon. Thanks. Larataguera (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trucks (sulfuric acid plant)

Avatar317, how are the trucks delivering sulfur "not relevant to the process?" It's obviously part of the process. If these trucks don't happen, the lithium doesn't happen. On the other hand, delivering sulfuric acid (instead of manufacturing it on-site) is clearly NOT part of the process, because that's not what they're doing. I don't understand your reasoning at all. (But I do appreciate your work on this article generally) Larataguera (talk) 00:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my reversion explanation was not that good: after I thought about it some more, it seemed that the energy generation wasn't really related to the new sulfuric acid separation either, but then realized that it would probably be better to add more overall process information rather than reduce the entire section to one sentence.

As far as relevancy, I was planning to change the section name to "Mining and extraction process" (to broaden the scope) and had more content from that same source ready (hydraulic shovels, tailings backfill the mine as it progresses) but wanted to respond to this before adding that to that section.

(I searched for more sources containing "sulfuric acid" and "Thacker Pass Lithium Mine", but didn't find anything else which talked about this other than company press releases and EIR report, so there seem to be no other sources to compare here.) The Lightcap2021 source mentions the safety issue of trucking sulfuric acid, "Sulfuric acid can be transported by truck, but it’s very dangerous if spilled. So the mine plans include...." This implies that this choice was made for safety (but for a for-profit company, "safety" really means lower insurance costs and maybe lower costs associated with fighting community resistance which would be likely be higher from transport of more dangerous chemicals) but wasn't explicitly stated. Thank you for discussing. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 01:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are other sources that talk about the sulfuric acid plant. It's in inside climate news and this academic study comparing Thacker Pass to extraction at Salton Sea (which I don't think we're using yet, but it's an interesting source). I think there's a few more, but I'd have to find them again. Larataguera (talk) 01:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source of the name?

Can I add a mention that the name "Thacker Pass" comes from "John Thacker", as mentioned in this article? [Quote: I look out across a landscape named after a man named John Thacker, a man who worked to protect mining industry profits for decades, and I cannot help but feel that not much has changed. Like in the 1850’s and 1860’s, men with explosives, backed by the armed power of the state, are coming to destroy the mountains, the sagebrush steppe, the grasslands, and the waters¬ of Thacker Pass.] Nicoadamo (talk) 23:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]