Talk:Taxis of the United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

DC meter suspension

"The zone system was instituted shortly after World War II when meters were first authorized, when a temporary suspension of the meter system was imposed." I don't get it. Were they authorized or suspended? --Gbleem 12:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gypsy Cab in New York

I'm watching a rerun of CSI NY and they have a dead gypsy cab driver. What about gypsy cabs in NY,NY? --Gbleem 12:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was a gypsy cab that was featured in the 1979 movie Going in Style. It was used for a plan to rob a bank in the Manhattan area. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.118.108.222 (talk) 20:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

New York City

I have merged in the separate article to eliminate a huge overlap. The entire US article is within recommended size limits so there is no need to splinter the information. 'Semi-formal' is not suitable to the article and has been moved back. TerriersFan 17:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merged taxi articles

Hi Terriers Fan - I agree with your assessment that the NYC taxicab article shared a lot of overlap with the US taxicab article. However, the New York City taxi is something of an icon in its own right. Taxis in Singapore and Hong Kong have specific articles about them. Given the high degree of regulation and uniqueness of NYC taxis, and their status in NYC's transportation mix, it makes sense that NYC taxis have a specific article covering them, too. Also, after merging the NYC taxi article into the US article the result is too lengthy and cumbersome and begs for breaking down the article in sub-articles again.

The best way to resolve the problem of overlap is to edit the content of the articles. The US article should discuss generalized, national issues, while the NYC taxi article should cover issues specific to NYC (of which there are many).

For these reasons I'd kindly ask you to undo the merge and address your legitimate concerns by editing the texts of the two articles. (I have just spent many hours overhauling the Transportation in New York City article in much the same way; yes, it takes time, but the final result is better quality.) Thanks for your consideration. Momos 19:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing your views and the work that you are doing on the transportation article. Before I started the rationalisation of taxi articles they were splintered all over the place. They now form a coherent structure with most countries being in Taxicabs around the world and individual articles for separate countries where appropriate (Singapore is an independent city-state and Hong Kong was independent and now has special status). If this article gets expanded to a point where it is above the recommended size we can split sections out but we are not there yet, particularly once I have edited doen the NYC section, which it badly needs.

You say "The US article should discuss generalized, national issues" - I couldn't disagree more. What that would mean would splitting out a series of city articles, for no purpose, and we would be back in the splintered state that I moved us from. Similar considerations apply to London and Taxicabs of the United Kingdom. I would add BTW that the 'Semi-formal' section falls outwith the scope of the taxicabs series.

There are also two other factors favouring larger, unified articles:

Readers find it much easier to get what they want from larger, properly indexed articles than having to read across several.
Splintered articles have serious problems of maintenance to ensure consistency across all versions of the same topic. HTH. TerriersFan 23:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TerriersFan- Thanks for your thoughtful comments. I've taken the liberty of renewing the NYC taxi article, but inspired by your points I've made a broad effort to frame it as an extension of the Transportation in New York City article rather than the Taxis in US article (to avoid the problem of splintering). You are correct that splitting out a series of city articles on taxis in the US would be entirely inappropriate. This is especially true because the story of taxis in US cities is essentially the same from one place to another, with differences only in fare structure (which are best addressed in one US article, as you rightly argue). New York is an exception, however, and not only because it overwhelms the US taxi article but because it is a genuinely different story: from labor strikes in the 1930s, to immigration and the cabbie workforce, to the racial politics of New York and the highly regulated medallion system, to the pop culture icon of the "yellow cab" -- these are all unique to the New York taxi and are not part of the taxi story elsewhere in the US. To cover this with the proper scope requires a separate article that I hope others will better develop from what currently exists. Also, you are mostly right about the semi-formal section; I've pared it down and don't totally oppose its elimination altogether. The original text for this article was written by someone who sounds like they have a gripe with the nyc taxi industry -- perhaps a cabbie? Momos 05:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this article was settling down nicely until you started to carve it about. We edit on here by concensus; if you wish to change the status quo you discuss and obtain concensus first then change later. Other editors can see the arguments - please leave things alone until we have other views and can establish the concensus position.

To show willing, and in an effort to compromise, I have replaced the NYC section with the text from your separate page with the exception of 'Semi-formal' which is more suited to the transportation article. TerriersFan 18:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NYC - citations

I have marked up some contentious statements with (fact) tags. These need to be sourced rapidly or will be removed - please see WP:CITE. TerriersFan 19:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission

This is a very poor section that is unsourced and contentious. I have removed the hype and tried to leave the section in a NPOV form. The section would benefit from the attentions of an interested editor who is prepared to source it. TerriersFan 20:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Why does the taxi have to be of a NYC taxi? Seems like a more unbiased approach should contain a picture of a taxi, and simply label it as a taxi. This article should not show favor to a particular city. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.228.110 (talk) 22:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting point. However, it is correct to label its origin since it makes the image more informative. What is needed is a good photo of a representative taxi in each city that has a section. Do you live in any; and if so can you take one? TerriersFan 02:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GTA IV (and maybe elsewhere)

When playing GTA, I noticed that most cabs had a circular red light above their license plate or their rear lights, and on their grille. What's with that?

-> It's an emergency light, to be activated by the cab driver if he feels threatened by his passenger(s). Usually, it's orange, though. It seems police officers are trained to look for the flashing lights, but outside the force, most people do not know about this. 84.143.94.86 (talk) 09:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boston

Why does it call someone a raghead? Seems racist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.133.55 (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another point. "The entire taxi partition market is saturated 100% with illegal partitions." Really? Every single partition in Boston is illegal? Seems a bit unlikely, frrankly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.93.49.173 (talk) 15:15, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Washington area

The fares for cabs in D.C. went up this year. Are the fares listed here the new ones? Also, the part about the Arlington, Virginia cabs does not name the company that has the all-hybrid fleet. Or are all licensed cabs in Arlington required to be hybrids? Bwrs (talk) 07:08, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Taxi Security" PoV issues

The discussion of security regulations in Boston cabs reads like a tract or a ballot proposition pitch. Digressions about how "nothing is bulletproof"? Descriptions of city offices being "silently apoplectic" when presented with simple counterarguments? It's unencyclopedic in tone and embarrassingly lopsided, and if I knew more about the issue I'd be first in line to fix it up. As it is I guess the best I can do is complain about it on a talkpage for now. 216.239.45.67 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Taxicabs of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070518050718/http://www.suntimes.com:80/news/metro/387199,CST-NWS-taxigas16.article to http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/387199,CST-NWS-taxigas16.article

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History

Would be nice to see some history of Taxicabs in the United States and more general background information. Right now it feels like a collection of shaky, bullet-pointed stubs about cabs in larger cities. Andythechef (talk) 03:36, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Taxicabs of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move city sections to "Transportation in..." articles?

Should the content in the individual city sections be moved to the "Transportation in..." articles? E.g. Move Taxis of the United States § Pittsburgh to Transportation in Pittsburgh § Taxis?

It seems that most of the info in these sections is highly local in relevance and would receive more attention in articles on those localities than on an article "...of the United States". — AjaxSmack 02:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good to me. Once you remove the unsourced content, there might not be much left to move, but it might be more relevant on those pages, since this article currently hosts info about a random collection of cities. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 01:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to remove anything. I don't like to mix issues/tasks like that; I'll defer to others on the sourcing issue. — AjaxSmack 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]