Talk:Taurus–Littrow/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 04:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Will review this article pretty soon.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I have failed the article in this category as the dating in the references differ, there are two styles used.. Also, check that there is a   between units and measurements as I see a few units and measurements without one. Also the values in the article must be converted eg. metric to imperial or vice versa. If possible use the convert template, {{convert|8|km|mi}}. You can also ad abbr=on to abbreviate the units, note that units should be spelled out the first time they are used. Also I fixed some prose issues. Issues fixed, pass.

   Unit conversions -  Done

   Fix ref retrieval dates -  Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The citations are reliable and each cite provided at the end of the paragraph supports everything withing that paragraph.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers everything that can be covered about a lunar valley and is focused on the valley and important people who were once there (Apollo 17).

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Congrats, passed.