Talk:Tatwine
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Tatwin)
Tatwine has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 30, 2019, July 30, 2022, and July 30, 2024. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tatwine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I've added a couple, or so, of wikilinks since they help clarify technical terms. It was not worth adding them to a "problem list".
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A short but well referenced article on a historical figure.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Not applicable: - no figures.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Not applicable: - no figures.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on gaining another GA for an Archbishop/Saint. Pyrotec (talk) 12:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Philosophy and religion good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- GA-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- GA-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- GA-Class Saints articles
- Low-importance Saints articles
- WikiProject Saints articles