Talk:THEM Anime Reviews
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For those who say that this is "not credible," please see this section of the WikiProject Anime and manga archive page, where it was concluded that this source is credible:
Are long-running blogs/websites like THEM anime that has been active since 2003 reliable enough to be cited in the reception section? Where do we draw the line, particularly when we are dealing with blogs/sites that have been running for many years and have multiple authors? I don't think a single-author blogs are reliable, but when they cross into small portals/sites... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Per WP:ANIME/RS, THEM Anime is reliable. For others, you may have to use the talk page on the sources page I just linked to see if other editors agree. lullabying (talk) 02:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- Start-Class anime and manga articles
- Low-importance anime and manga articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles