Jump to content

Talk:Transvision (Indonesia)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:TELKOMVision)
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by SheriffIsInTown, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 31 March 2024.

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to TelkomVision. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


TELKOMVisionTelkomVision – TelkomVision logo has been changed since January 26, 2011, with "Telkom" capitalization. Reference: [1], [2], [3]. Xeysx (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 4 March 2020

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Disambiguated. BD2412 T 18:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transvision (Indonesia)Transvision – disambiguation not necessary. St3095 (?) 11:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Relisting. © Tbhotch (en-3). 18:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: Oh, that's it! So, I want to withdraw this proposal right now. And for anyone, please create Transvision as "disambiguation page providing links to topics that could be referred to by the same search term". St3095 (?) 03:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a WP:TWODABS situation, it needs to be checked if one is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC – if one is, that one does not require the disambiguation, and a hatnote should be used to point to the other... So it's not yet established that this RM is "wrong". --IJBall (contribstalk) 13:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.