Jump to content

Talk:Suzuki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why should talk page be used to make annotations, when inline is more precise?

[edit]

I am saying this in response to an edit that was reverted by Loriendrew Reverting edits is very much easy. Inline annotation don't prevent anymore from reading articles. If there are several ways of editing, why should only one be authorised.

Apart discouraging editing that policy doesn't accomplish much, that's quixotic.

--Kamil Hasenfeller (talk) 10:44, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes no sense

[edit]

10th worldwide and 3rd in Japan, but 11th overall worldwide. Doesn't compute.

Production rank aren't comparable to sales rank. Some other manufacturer may produce most of their cars for other brands vice versa, thus could end up in a different rank. Andra Febrian (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peacockery: needs extensive rewrite and citation checks

[edit]

This article seems to have become filled with peacockery that egregiously violates the Neutral point of view policy. "Astounding power output"? "Eclipsed all rivals"? "A class of its own"? This all straight form Suzuki's marketing department, and fails verification. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think a lot of it is due to user Whitebook's recent edits - I don't think it's a serious problem, just seems a very enthusiastic user. Maybe a kindly worded talkpage message about peacockery will convince them to tone things down a bit? I support your recent prunings wholeheartedly, and will check in occasionally.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Suzuki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Digital pianos

[edit]

I need the bar that supports the keys on my wonderful GP-3 because a few of the keys don't work any longer. So far (and I understand) my highly qualified repair tech in Portland said he would have the part in four weeks. After four weeks I called him and he said another four weeks. I get the backup in international trade. Is there a source in the U.S? 2600:100F:B131:309F:7D74:B493:F90B:107 (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suzuki samurai 150 in Bangladesh.

[edit]

Ballrecer not found after 4 moths for Suzuki samurai 150cc in Bangladesh. Help me please. K.M.ALTAF HOSAIN SUZUKI SAMURAI 150CC'S WONER PERCES DATE.27/12/2020 COUNTRY.BANGLADESH MOBILE+01726863420. FROM- KUSHTIA DISTRICT IN BANGLADESH. 113.11.62.123 (talk) 04:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

[edit]
  • Reassess article
Fails B-class criteria. Inline "Citation needed" tags back to Dec 2014. -- Otr500 (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Suzuki&oldid=1212599705"