Talk:Sunny Lee

Sunny Lee has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 3, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sunny Lee is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sunny Lee/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Storylines section, there's something odd with this sentence ---> "Sunny believes that she has humiliated herself and decides to find out who 'Lost Boy' he is". Same section, "However, Zeke moves out, so Sunny's parents won't worry about them" ---> "However, Zeke moves out, so Sunny's parents will not worry about them".
Done Hopefully fixed.
Yup, and check.

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
In the Characterisation section, please link "aloof" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. Same section, "...Lee said that Sunny took a 'sacrifice' in leaving as she didn't want her parents turning up and ruining everyone's lives" ---> "...Lee said that Sunny took a 'sacrifice' in leaving as she did not want her parents turning up and ruining everyone's lives", per here.
Done I've linked "aloof" to it's entry at wiktionary, is that okay? It doesn't have an article here. I can always unlink it though, I don't think it's that important. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 20:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Check, and the aloof linkage is fine with me, though, it's really all up to you on the linking, since it's your article.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
~~The link title in References 25 should not be in all capitals, per here.~~
Done
Check.

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how did I fail to notice you had taken this on? Lol. Thank you for your review, I'll get working on the points you raised. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 19:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With the changes done i also support GA status for the article. Congrats.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the decision falls with me, as I'm the reviewer, so thank you to JuneGloom for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) Also, you're welcome for the review. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[1][2]RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 05:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't really anything to add from those. I've already used the best of the Daily Mail entries about Sunny in the article. Thanks though! - JuneGloom Talk 18:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh, I noticed the best rants were already used. :DRAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 01:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[3] chirpy Donna!RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 04:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Topics related to Sunny Lee'

Can someone explain what the new addition to the article actually is and why it helps the reader? Because I don't get it and it seems a little pointless to me. There aren't any more articles relating to the character. She's mentioned in a couple of character articles and is included on the past characters list, but that's it. - JuneGloom Talk 01:14, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it either as it doesn't seem to do anything? It's just there! It doesn't open or seem to lead anywhere. Confused.com here I'm going to ask the editor that put it on the page.--5 albert square (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did just find this - [4]. - JuneGloom Talk 01:28, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just read that briefly, I don't see how adding something like that though would benefit this particular article though.--5 albert square (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is the issue the shell (not the link from See also)? The purpose of the shell is to provide a visual link when the reader jumps from the link in See also. You are certainly free to remove it if you find it does not serve that purpose. With regard to the rationale for the link itself, see the discussion at Template_talk:Navbox_link. (Of course, as the regular editors of this article you are free to remove that as well.) Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 01:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sunny Lee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://holysoap.five.tv/neighbours/cast/sunny-lee-3753
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090905164257/http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/07/31/soapstar-superstars-july to http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/07/31/soapstar-superstars-july/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]