Talk:Suning.com

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

October 2009

So apparently the fact that they managed to take a fair chunk of a big-name Japanese retailer isn't notable enough to stay on this page? 58.34.153.238 (talk) 09:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 01 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 ^talk 02:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suning Commerce Group → Suning Holdings Group – <imprecise page name> – Linglin Niu (talk) 23:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Linglin Niu: The article varies about what the name is. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Suning Commerce Group and Suning Holdings Group are two company. Matthew_hk t c 16:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically the Chinese football club was owned by 苏宁电器集团有限公司 (literally Suning Appliance Group) NOT Suning Commerce Group (ex-苏宁电器股份). Matthew_hk t c 18:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The target is an article on what is apparently a different organisation. Do not complicate the mess. There is no rationale given for the move. Note also that proposer is a single issue account. COI should be investigated. Andrewa (talk) 10:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was contacted by this guy claiming he is an employee. Alex Chou (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) Not sure why they intentionally want to write an article for Suning Holdings Group (in that namespace), but also claiming Suning Holdings Group is equal to Suning Commerce Group. Matthew_hk t c 16:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.