Talk:Submerged arc welding

Inappropriate redirect

Underwater welding should not redirect to Submerged Arc Welding as they are totally separate subjects. This redirect is confusing and misleading.

Quote from the SAW article: "Underwater welding refers to a number of distinct welding processes that are performed underwater and should not be confused with the SAW process."

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.36.94 (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree - I'm going to split the article, as it seems to be two unrelated topics --Ozhiker (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-continously fed"

The lead currently states that the electrode must be non-continuous. Surely this is an error - the wire is spooled up and the process is usually automated.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Pros & Cons"

Editors feel this article has a Pros and Cons section, but it does not. It does list the technical advantages of the SMAW process, and also the limitaions of this technology.Waynems (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well the “Limitations” section says the process is limited to ”high thickness materials”, while the “Advantages” section lists the possibility of “high speed welding of thin sheet steels”—some readers might get the impression that the article contradicts itself. 2601:C2:1600:CDD4:7181:E936:8D09:3296 (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Submerged arc welding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517143848/http://millerwelds.com/pdf/Submerged.pdf to http://www.millerwelds.com/pdf/Submerged.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reuse of slag as flux

this can be revolutionary in world. you can also mix the slag with flux at various compositions and various properties of welding can be produced.first slag is to be powered and then we have to mix and then we have to check our requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1995candy (talk • contribs) 10:15, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flux is cheap, welding is expensive. This process would require either a "slag recycling machine" on site (more capital cost) or else shipping slag back to a recycling facility - and in my country, we can't even get recycling alumin cans right. This is apart from the whole issue of chemistry, and flux vs. slag composition. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]