Talk:Structure from motion
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anna.bergstrom, Mackjohnson77, Jvsaghi, Kwright1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation needs to be added
[edit]there is a new disambiguation page: Structure from motion (disambiguation). Thus this article should be renamed, for instance, "Structure from motion (computer vision)". I was unable to do it, please help. Also the disambiguation page should be edited to reflect the new name.
Autodesk 123D Catch
[edit]Autodesk 123D catch is a free hobby App to capture Struction from motion images, its a cloud app for iPhone 4 and newer and for the new iPads, can i ad that to the applications list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.195.234.67 (talk) 03:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
SfM vs. phtogrammetry
[edit]For me it is completely unclear where the difference between these two methods are. Or if they have something in common. Well, in other words, I see many people saying they are doing SfM but what I see is photogrammetry. Also in the photogrammetry article i see references of SfM as if it is just another designation for it. I'm jsut confused --Patribus (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
editing SfM for the geosciences
[edit]I think the section on SfM for the geosciences could be edited. Particularly, there can be a citation added to the comparison of the data quality between SfM and lidar. This paper tests both methods: ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications [1] Anna.bergstrom (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021