Talk:Straw man (dummy)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Straw man (dummy) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Disambiguating "Straw Man"
[edit]This content comes from the original "Straw Man" article, which has now been disambiguated into several articles. For a full history up until March 6, 2006, see Straw man. -- MisterHand 03:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
"...and are usually far more effective than the straw man."
[edit]- -) Love it! CapnZapp (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move to Straw man (dummy), with no prejudice for any future merge with Scarecrow if a formed consensus supports it. JPG-GR (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Straw man (literal) → Straw man (physical), Straw man (tool), Straw man (object), Straw man (item), Straw man (agricultural), Straw man (dummy) or Straw dummy — The current disambiguation word "literal" seems a little unusual. I can understand the explanation, "Literally a straw man", but it would seem unusual to someone unfamiliar with the figurative sense of "straw man". Thus, I'd suggest that the disambiguation be made with something related to the subject rather than how it is not another subject. — —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 10:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''or*'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support move to Straw man (dummy) or Straw man (mannequin). Current page title made me smirk though. --erachima talk 10:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Straw man (dummy) makes sense; a mannequin implies more rigidity. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- Merge → Scarecrow . inasmuch as this straw man is merely a stub, and there's really very little else to be said in this article that wouldn't be already covered in scarecrow--emerson7 15:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Straw man (dummy) is OK; Straw man (human figure) also came to mind. Deor (talk) 22:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Straw man (literal)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Straw man (literal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 7 § Straw man (literal) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 16:13, 7 September 2024 (UTC)