Talk:Unity Reed High School

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Start‑class Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Stonewall logo.jpg

Image:Stonewall logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pwcs logo blue.jpg

Image:Pwcs logo blue.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of the "Demographics" section.

This has been the status quo for some six years, since the section's inclusion in 2012. User John_from_Idegon has since removed it on November 30th, 2018, and the section has since become the subject of an edit war.

I am reinstating the section as it has stood for six years and, while being updated throughout the years using the same PWCS-provided resource, has not been removed by anyone but John, as far as I can see from the page history. Thus I am assuming the consensus is to include this section (which, when I discussed this conflict with John, seemed to be his biggest concern with my reinstitution of the section).

Since I suppose, however, that silence is not equal to consent, this talk section now exists for anyone who disagrees with my assumption of consensus to voice their opinion. If there is truly a consensus for your actions, John, please let it be seen now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horizons 1 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are over 25,000 articles on US high schools on Wikipedia. I have no problem with including demographics. I have a problem with using a connected source when independent sources exist. Using NCES is more or less standard, and if you source the stats to them, my opposition evaporates. So what the issue? Why is it so important to use the school district as a source? And no matter how trivial it may seem to you, this is a collaborative project. You've been informed of the need to sign your edits, but you are refusing to do so. That's disruptive. Your since removed comments on my talk indicate that you have some connection to the school, but you've refused to clarify the relationship despite being asked directly. That's disruptive. You are refusing to discuss with arguement based in sources and policy. That's disruptive. You are consistantly reverting to your preferred version, which is edit warring and disruptive. You made a change to the article. I reverted it. Now we discuss. You do not restore your preferred version then discuss. I'll ask one more time. What is your relationship with the school? I'm not asking for your name; but rather for you to clarify what your position with the school and or district is. Just to be clear, if you have any relationship with the school, you have a COI, whether you are an employee, administrator, student, parent or alumni. The only question is whether your conflict reaches the level of PAID. You are a PAID editor if you've received or will receive direct compensation for your edits. However, you are also paid if you are doing your job by editing Wikipedia. That would include being a general administrator (principal or superintendent), being employed as a media relations specialist or a social media manager, a publicist or any job where your duties may include internet presence management. An encyclopedia article is not a place to deposit information from the school. Instead, an encyclopedia article should consist of information paraphrased and summarized from reliable independent sources. This article is not for the school; it is about the school. John from Idegon (talk) 01:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Walt's 6/5/2020 statement.

I've already corrected the mistake. But the superintendent only and can only call for name change of a school. The position cannot make a name change final without school board approval. Xeracross (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]