Talk:Stereosonic

Australia: Queensland / Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Stereosonic is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Festivals Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Content removal

An IP editor and then User:MissMelbourne has removed sourced material from this article which may be regarded as projecting a negative image. Since the edit summaries conveniently omit or explain this removal it is safe to assume that is was done for promotional purposes. I'm making sure other editors are aware of this and in response we should take the time to expand in greater detail the material which has been attempted to be removed. - Shiftchange (talk) 11:23, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, going back through the edit logs shows User:MissMelbourne has regularly removed topics of drug related incidents. I've updated the page to reflect the 2015 Sydney event - and hopefully when I get more time I can move it all into a 'criticisms/incidents' heading. Mithrils (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Pinging' @Shiftchange and MissMelbourne: for comment. Mithrils, per "criticisms/incidents" see WP:CRITS for ~~policy~~ (sorry, it's an essay, not policy) advice and discussion regarding 'criticism' or 'controversy' sections. 220 of ^Borg 08:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is why I was pinged - I don't see the need for a criticism section. The existing section headings should be fine and we just need to summarise the important facts in a neutral tone with references. - Shiftchange (talk) 08:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before seeing this reply I have updated with another death at Adelaide, hopefully neutrally, and then added an "Incident" sub-heading before the deaths content. 220 of ^Borg 05:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Stereosonic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]