Talk:Stephen Hahn

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

COVID-19 Low‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Stephen Hahn sworn in.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malapropism

"Hahn has factored prominently in the Trump administration's attempts to...." Read not factored" but "featured"S. Valkemirer (talk) 09:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Í[reply]

Requested move 18 October 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Stephen Hahn the oncologist is a major figure in the Trump administration as the head of the FDA, especially during the covid pandemic. If you are unconvinced of this argument, a move to "Stephen Hahn (physician)” would also be better per WP:OVERPRECISION. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 21:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:RECENT: see pageviews. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but also agree that the "physician" would be better than "oncologist." His notoriety does not come from this work in oncology, but rather as the head of the FDA (and earlier as head of MD Anderson). BA Schuetze (talk) 02:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even before the pandemic, previous (not even currently in office) FDA commissioners were individually getting 10x the views of the art dealer, Stephen Hahn. FDA commissioner pageviews. This leads me to believe, even if Stephen Hahn is removed from his post, this page will still be more notable than the page for the art dealer. BA Schuetze (talk) 14:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support - the current pandemic will stay relevant in the future and he is an important person there. The page of the art dealer is rarely visited (more visitors recently as side effect of the doctor's importance) and the other people have very minor importance. --mfb (talk) 07:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Stephen Hahn is getting a lot of attention right now because the pandemic is a current issue. As noted above, this is an example of WP:RECENT. The pandemic will surely be a topic of interest for decades to come -- but that doesn't imply that Hahn will. Furthermore, even in the unlikely event that this person continues to be the most interesting of all the Stephen Hahns, that isn't enough to make the suggested change, which would put him in the place of being more interesting that all other Stephen Hahns combined. TypoBoy (talk) 13:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because they don't seem to last long - he is Trump's 4th (or is it 5th?), & Obama and Bush had 3 each. On past form he could well be on the job market in 3 months. Revisit if he's still there in March. Johnbod (talk) 16:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
oppose per Johnbod--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 16 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Solid argument. No objections. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 05:07, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– He didn't make it to March, but that's because he made it to the end of Trump's term and Joe Biden became president on January 20, 2021. Even after leaving office, the physician has had more pageviews each day than the dab page and the art dealer combined. Even when you include the pageviews of the seven FDA comissioners before Hahn, the other Stephen Hahns are at the bottom of the list. Considering that Hahn was the Commissioner of the FDA during the early parts of the pandemic and was involved in the authorization of the Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J vaccines in the United States, I feel like he is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, despite others thinking that this is just an example of WP:RECENTISM. I'm pretty sure the guy whose decisions affected the lives of the millions of people living in the United States of America is going to have more long term significance than a guy who owned art and opened a small gallery. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 07:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 07:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject California has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 07:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Medicine has been notified of this discussion. 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 07:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Though the physician's average pageviews have certainly declined since he left office, they seem to now be fairly stable. The physician's article has received 40 to 50 daily views on most dates within the past month, dramatically more views than the art dealer and the disambiguation page combined; this suggests to me that the physician is retaining long-term significance. His role as the head of a major US government agency also strengthens his case for long-term significance, as discussed by the nominator. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.