Talk:STAYC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the STAYC article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 December 2020. The result of the discussion was Snow keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

STAYC vs StayC

My edit in which I changed all mentions of "StayC" to "STAYC" was recently reverted by HDORS (talk · contribs). However, there is no mention of this formatting on the official twitter, company website, or any other official channels. There are some articles that refer to them as "StayC," but it's never an official spelling. Additionally, as the group-name is an acronym (Star to a Young Culture), it falls in line with other K-pop groups to format their name in all-caps (VIXX, NU'EST). As I have edited and it's been reverted, I believe we are now meant to discuss. If there is any reason for the name to remain as "StayC" please let me know. Lukestepford (talk) 02:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved because no one disagree. In addition, though it's pronounced as "Stay-C", but it's not reason to use lowercase letter (non-administrator close) [ Talk to me ] Show! Music Core and more favorite 14:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

StayC → STAYC – The current page title is incorrect, as per MOS:CAPSACRS and WP:COMMONNAME. STAYC stands for Star To A Young Culture as per the group official website. In addition, this is the commonly used styling, as seen in Forbes, NME, Apple Music, Spotify, Newsen, Herald Pop, YTN and Sports Donga to name a few. The move would put the title inline with other group articles in which their name is acronym of something such as BTS, NU'EST, VIXX, NCT, U-KISS, TEEN TOP, MBLAQ and many more. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - it's an acronym and should be formatted as such per nominator. Evaders99 (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - same reason as Evaders99. Byy2 (talk) 06:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Controversy Regarding Plagiarism

Given that there has been much back and forth revision editing, I think it's best to open a page on the inclusion of the "plagiarism controversy" on STAYC's page. I find that the sources provided are not particularly notable to the group but rather to the production company, as in both articles it specifically states that the production company, Legend Film, was the one to issue the apology. Neither HighUp Entertainment nor STAYC have commented on the matter, and I find it hard to justify its inclusion on the Wikipedia page about the group, especially in a section all on its own. For instance, the controversy about Red Velvet's music video for Happiness had considerably more sources yet remains within the main text of the article rather than a separate controversy section. This honestly feels like an attempt to slander STAYC rather than a genuine effort to improve the quality of the group's wikipedia page, given that their previous two comebacks have a single sentence each. Am happy to hear other's thoughts about this. Lukestepford (talk) 17:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is this "slander"? If it was accurate to the facts being reported by reliable sources, it is not slander. WP:NOTCENSORED Evaders99 (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I) Firstly, please read WP:BRD. Secondly, the information like Luke have mentioned is pertaining to the production company rather than group nor the group agency (HighUp Entertainment). Such information definitely doesn't require a dedicated section but can/may be mentioned briefly in the History/Career section. The entire section should only be included in So Bad (STAYC song), this is the same approach taken for Happiness (Red Velvet song), as both are pertaining/concerning the song's music video. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 01:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How about revert about member order? The order should be: Sumin, Sieun, Isa, Seeun, Yoon, J. 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Please comment on content, not on me 01:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I) Please see latest revision. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 01:52, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

STAYC 2022.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:06, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where's Bubble?

It's 2024 and no one bothered to put the info of their latest 2023 comeback? I'd do it, but I have problems finding an appropriate citation for it. 「HypeBoy」^TALK 03:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]