Talk:Star World

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Star World article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Television Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

untitled

Does STAR World not air Bold and Beautiful anymore? Someone edited it out and if anything, it should be in the article as a testimonial to its worldwide popularity (which is mentioned in the B&B article itself). Mike H. That's hot 04:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Star World also shows General Hospital, LOST, Kevin Hill, The Oc.

I'm in Israel, and I don't have any of those except General Hospital...plus, there are shows here not on the list. I'm reluctant to add them, though. M e t h n o r^{Talk to me!}

Clean-Up

This article may require clean-up... especially in the History part. i will try to clean it.

Article fix, all done. Eve215454 11:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:STAR World.jpg

Image:STAR World.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schedule Colors

Orange, Gold and Yellow all look very similar. Instead of 3 shades of yellow, a dark blue and/or a purple color would look nice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.57.115 (talk) 06:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

The line "In the future Cartoon Network will destroy it" is definitely non informative and out of place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Navalchopra20 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the History section of the document, the following is said about the new STAR World logo - "The new logo was adopted universally on January 1, 2011". This is either a mistake or a statement written to avoid the effort to re-edit it after the said date. I am changing the was to will be and will revert it back on January 1, 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VirajParipatyadar (talk • contribs) 13:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Lordbahamutneo, 27 August 2011

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Lordbahamutneo (talk) 04:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Please specify the desired change in your request. —C.Fred (talk) 04:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of rebrading effort

Star world has changed its programming and even its bumpers to different colors and styles to atract a different market recently and I think it deserves some mention 118.167.198.200 (talk) 14:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

StarWorld → STAR World – WP:COMMONNAME. "StarWorld" is only using for logo. John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can you show Google Books results for the last 10 years please. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Google Books?? But I have Google search results. Links are shown as Star World instead of StarWorld.--John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 14:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support this title exists in use without capitals as well as with; while "STAR" is an acronym, so STAR is a supported Wikipedia title format. The proposed title would align the article with sibling articles. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:STAR Jalsha which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on STAR World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20151003104948/http://www.startv.com/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?seq=3541 to http://www.startv.com/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?seq=3541

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]