Talk:St Wilfrid's Catholic High School, North Featherstone

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal St Wilfrid's Catholic High School, North Featherstone is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article desperately is in need of cleanup. If anyone can help, this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! Tim.bounceback^{(talk | contribs | ubxen)} 22:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a start. Most of the offending document was copied-and-pasted from www.wakefield.gov.uk. Some of the text has been removed- Wikipedia is not the Schools own website, and most of this deleted information should go on there (even if that does appear to be broken at the moment).

It still needs more work, more references would be nice, and an introductory paragraph explaining what the School Saints And Forms is all about would be interesting. Chriswiki 08:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on St Wilfrid's Catholic High School, North Featherstone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information on this article is old and it is written in a favourable viewpoint

'The April 2007 inspection by OfSTED recognised the school as "Good with Outstanding features". The subsequent Religious Education inspection awarded an "Outstanding" judgement.' It fails to discuss the more recent inspections, and the inspections of other departments, which were not so favourable.
'Also the school has undergone renovations' this was written in 2006, making them 14 years old at this point.
Frequently mentions that it's a language college, even-though it has stopped offering language resources in the sixth form this year, and no longer has that status.
Many of the awards are for the 2005-2008 time period, when a lot of things could have changed.
Frequently mentions positives, and not drawbacks, so it is not written in a unbiased point of view
Controversy over management and uniform policy should be mentioned

In my opinion, it is in need of an almost completely new rewrite, but please discuss. --WillDixon (talk) 12:53, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]