This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles
This article is currently confused between being a zoo and a historic place. If we are going to keep the historic places infobox, then I think the article should be named to match, with appropriate redirects from the zoo names. If we keep the current name, I think we should be using the zoo infobox. I don't have a preference of which way to go on this issue, and I don't know of any "project precedence" rules that might apply. I just put the "National Register of Historic Places" template at the bottom of the page. Since we are using the historic places infobox at this time, I placed it first. Donlammers (talk) 10:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I added the zoo infobox, and embedded the NRHP infobox in it. The project came up with the fix a while ago, since there are a number of sites on the Register like this (lighthouses, for example). Hopefully that should solve the problem. If there's other tweaking that needs doing, tweak away. That's what Wikipedia's about, after all. :) I'm hoping to get better shots of the zoo, the inside particularly in the near future. Stay tuned. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is great. I didn't even know you could do this (though I suppose I should have guessed). Better pix would be great too, though my primary interest is in Colorado zoos (my home state, of course). Thanks for the quick response. Donlammers (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
