Talk:Spooks series 7/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Spooks (series 7)/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 23:27, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Let's get to knocking another one of these out then.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Prose style is grand. The red link to nuclear suitcase bomb should be nuclear suitcase bomb though.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- MOS seems fine.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Sources are fine, used well, and everything is supported so OR isn't a problem.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- The article's broad enough in scope without dwelling too much on any individual episode or going off elsewhere.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article is neutral and unbiased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Article history is stable and uncontroversial.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Images are grand - used appropriately and sourced adequately.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- All things added up, I see no reason not to pass this article. Good job.
- Pass or Fail: