Talk:Royal Spanish Football Federation

Spain High‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Spain High‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as High-importance).

Article title

Why has this article been reverted to English title. Body is not known by this name. Next somebody will be changing Real Madrid to Royal Madrid or Atletico Madrid to Athletic Madrid. When will this stupid discrimation against Spanish language stop.--86.135.160.97 20:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a discrimination, don't forget this is the English Wikipedia. As the Wikipedia:Manual of Style states, the article title should be in English (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English)). But I don't like "Royal Snpanish Football Federation" neither. The most common term to refer to the RFEF in the English language press is "Spanish Football Federation"[1][2][3]), (but I've also found "Spanish Football Association"[4]). Therefore, from my POV this article should be renamed to Spanish Football Federation, like the Italian Football Federation. Best regards --surueña 10:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done: moved from Real Federación Española de Fútbol to Spanish Football Federation. --surueña 07:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect date

The correct date when RFEF was founded is 1913, not 1909. The president of RFEF (Villar) distorts the date, because in 1909 has founded the first Footbal Federation in Spain (Federación Española de Clubs de Foot-Ball, Spanish Federation of Foot-Ball Clubs). Because many problems, FECF broke up and founded the RFEF. In the Spanish version of this article is more explained. --Hectordonis (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Royal Spanish Football Federation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308190228/http://www.rfef.es/index.jsp?nodo=39&ID=484 to http://www.rfef.es/index.jsp?nodo=39&ID=484

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]