Talk:SpaceX Crew-5

Mission Duration

One section says "Mission duration 180 days (planned)" but then below it, it says "Time docked 90–120 days (planned)". Since these conflict, one must be wrong. Jesse Schulman (talk) 11:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this doesn't add up. Also:

Docking date

September 2022 (planned)

Undocking date

December 2022 (planned)

Doesn't add up either.

Granted, there have been dragons that where relocated during the mission to the other docking port, so another spacecraft with need for docking harmony forward can dock. But even if this is planned for this mission, this is very confusing. Christoph194 (talk) 12:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Draft:SpaceX Crew-5 into SpaceX Crew-5

Does draft contain any additional information? Robert McClenon (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Koichi Wakata

I cannot find any source for this. 2001:983:2ED1:1:ED7E:8E43:FF0D:BDD (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Number of flights (to be) was shown as five, while the number of launches will be four (three so far). Therefore I added the number of launches. -84user (talk) 13:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is his fifth launch, STS-72, STS-92, STS-119, Soyuz TMA-11M, and now Crew-5 redlegsfan21 (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russian flag

I cannot find any source for this. Hektor (talk) 12:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting photos from geostationary satellite

The zoom cameras on the GOES-16 and GOES-17 satellites were dedicated on the launch site for a few hours to support the launch, as noted in ^[1],^[2], and ^[3]. I have personally collected several of these photos with my own dish and software at 2,000x2,000 image resolution. Would it help the article if I uploaded these to illustrate the weather conditions at launch? • Jesse V.^(talk) 20:54, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Infobox (as of March 6)

Please consider changing to, "March 2023 (current plan)
Time docked
149 days, 19 hours and 21 minutes (145 days according to earlier plan)".
(The current mention of "plan ... plan", is arguably not okay.) Thanks, 2001:2020:345:B4AE:99C8:B847:50AA:6D87 (talk) 17:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/messages/2022/10/MSG_20221005_1122.html

[2] ttps://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/messages/2022/10/MSG_20221005_1117.html

[3] ttps://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/messages/2022/10/MSG_20221005_1126.html

[1]

[2]

[3]