Talk:Soviet cruiser Krasny Krym/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 02:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   What references does the second link in the Links section have?

   It wouldn't load for me, so I just deleted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is there any more information about its post WWII service?

   No, and that's what's annoying. Even Russian-language sources don't have squat about its post-war service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 03:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Considering that it's a thorough as it's ever going to be, I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 03:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)