Talk:Soviet aircraft carrier Kiev

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Pronouns

He not a She.

He's a russian ship, so would be a he not a she. Russian thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.243.189.133 (talk) 09:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a Russian-language site. The English-language convention used for ships is "she", regardless of country or origin. I actually prefer the grammatically correct it, as it would avoid national preference arguments, but I'm not going to get my way on that either. - BillCJ (talk) 09:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be aircraft carrying cruiser instad of Aircraft carrier?

It says that it is called such by the Russians and on top of that the footnote says that it is a correct discription. Why insist on calling it a carrier? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.214.57.217 (talk) 14:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cuz we smartass Russians only ever called it an aircraft-carrying cruiser to save face, due to an earlier propaganda campaign about carriers being the ultimate imperialist weapon for neo-colonial oppression. That made us feel WAY more righteous and all-around better about our decidedly innocent and ideologically true selves. Aadieu (talk) 02:00, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is also the reason of wanting to work around the limitations of the Montreux Convention on aircraft carriers (see § Aircraft carriers). — Saxifrage ✎ 18:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivity

Sad how no one is even able to go to the Chinese web to find the (now) corporate web page of the ship. The article is dated from 2011; Shame on the editors who participated. No blame on the Russians since this is an English-language portal, please. Dark Liberty (talk) 06:30, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article was not written all at once in 2011. Feel free to add missing information with sources. — Saxifrage ✎ 18:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Soviet aircraft carrier Kiev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029032131/http://russian-ships.info/eng/warships/project_1143.htm to http://russian-ships.info/eng/warships/project_1143.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]