Talk:Southern Patagonian Ice Field

Chile High‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discusión de información pubicada sobre campos de hielo.

Los dos vínculos en español son a páginas Argentinas que buscan reafirmar su posición frente a la demarcación. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sebasland (talk • contribs) 19:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Discusión de información pubicada sobre campos de hielo.

Los dos vínculos en español son a páginas Argentinas que buscan reafirmar su posición frente a la demarcación. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sebasland (talk • contribs) 19:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

DEJE LOS TEXTOS CON 2 CAMBIOS:

1) Se agrego el país de pertenencia de los glaciares y el nombre para de esta manera para no confundir la foto del glaciar Grey con la foto del glaciar perito moreno. Supongo que no tiene nada de malo complementar la información incluyedo una referencia a su país.

2) Borre nuevamente los 2 links a esos "estudios", que usted los considere correctos no es motivo suficiente para publicarlos, si usted los coloca supongo que aceptará la inclusión de estudios Chilenos sobre la materia, con lo que haga me dirá que hacer.

Imparcial es justamente borrar toda mencion Argentina en este articulo (incluyendo wikiproyect) y agregar la palabra CHILE en cada frase. Recupere mencion del pedido del 2006 el cual esta referenciado (diario clarin) y los 2 links externos son justamente trabajos importantes relacionados a los Hielos, que usted los considere imparciales no es motivo suficiente para borrarlos. Jor70 22:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resp: Chile tiene 5/6 de campos de hielo, lo unico que hice fue referenciar el glaciar grey, así como esta referenciado el perito moreno. Si coloca nuevamente los links supongo aceptará estudios chilenos del problema de demarcación, referenciados obviamente.

Continental?

"third biggest extension of continental ice after Antarctica and Greenland."

Although I understand this statement, is this technically right? Greenland after all is not a continent in its own right (although I sometimes wonder if it should count as one)--MacRusgail (talk) 13:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Southern Patagonian Ice Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the area size? Comment

Is it 16,800 km² as is in the template, or is it 12,363 km² as is stated in the Geography section? אביהו (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Hello Lenmae, do you think this can be a reference? [1] Janitoalevic (talk) 18:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]