Talk:Some Hearts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Country music High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Couldn't this album be classified as gospel because two first singles were 'Inside your heaven' and 'Jesus, take the wheel'? 85.217.47.47 (talk) 01:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm not mistaken, Some Hearts has landed at #1 on Billboard's Year End Chart (according to perezhilton.com)....can anyone confirm/disconfirm? The chart goes from Nov '05-'06, so surely it should be known?

68.229.164.101 02:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some Hearts picture

Can someone please upload the picture of the album Some Hearts? -Omghgomg 11:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging from Lessons Learned, Starts with Goodbye and Whenever You Remember

The Lessons Learned, Starts with Goodbye and Whenever You Remember articles consist entirely of personnel and track listing information, which could easily fit into the main album article. Thoughts? Extraordinary Machine 13:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is going nowhere. I am going to merge it, but the information is redunant. I don't think it is necessary. Omghgomg 08:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a side note, the articles have been deleted instead as it was too redunant to include. σмgн gσмg 07:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Good primary topic arguments by those in support that have not been refuted. — Jenks24 (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Very clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. This album has sold 7.45 million copies in the United States and 9 million copies worldwide, and is the best-selling country music album of its decade. Page view statistics also show that this article is by far the most viewed of topics named "Some Hearts". sst✈ 16:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless WP:NCM guides giving artist names for exactly this kind of situation with multiple albums and songs. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: WP:NCM guides giving artist names for exactly this kind of situation with multiple albums and songs. was added by In ictu oculi after Unreal7 has made her comment. sst✈ 12:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And so what? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:02, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore the above and support. Clear primary topic as shown by the nominator. Unreal7 (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Google seems to indicate the song instead of the album may be more likely -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think the single from the album is more significant than the album itself. Page view statistics also show that the album has received far more views. sst✈ 07:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The album receives 86% of the page views among the ambiguous topics. A cursory Google Books search also suggests it's far more prominent in the sources. In fact, Some Hearts (song) is mostly prominent due to being recorded by Underwood for this album. Looks like a pretty clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC case.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reversed a non-admin closure as "no consensus", as I feel the arguments here support a move.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Cúchullain. Seems pretty clear-cut. Dohn joe (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – pointless primarytopic grab as iio points out. Dicklyon (talk) 04:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- How? Disambiguation should only be used when it is required. There is evidence this is the primary topic and should take the base title. SSTflyer 08:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Some Hearts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]