Talk:Smok wawelski

A fact from Smok wawelski appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a fossilized dragon has been found in Poland?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/August.

Wikipedia

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Smok wawelski is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should this be at Smok wawelski?

I think there was some talks about disambiguation parenthesis not being needed for monotypic taxa? Maybe IJReid said this? FunkMonk (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, looking again, seems Smok wawelski is occupied by the dragon. But should it be? That article is now at the English name. Confusing situation... FunkMonk (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was a discussion where we revised the standard and put "Genus species" as priority to anything "Genus (some bracketed word)". But if Smok wawelski is already taken, by an article that is currently at its proper name, we simply leave this. I'm not sure why Smok wawelski has an article, unless theres a disambiguation it should probably be at Smok since its the thing every other Smok name is taken from. IJReid ^{{{T - C - D - R}}} 15:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion about such issues here:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]