Jump to content

Talk:SliTaz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:SliTaz GNU/Linux)

I Like To Move It

[edit]

I realized after i created this page that it should probably have just been named "SliTaz". Can someone please do the redirection? -Monz (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

I disagree with the notability challenge, which the author didn't even bother to justify. Slitaz is a functional mini-Linux (I've tried it), and we have similar projects like Puppy Linux here on Wikipedia. Maikel (talk) 18:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SliTaz with Midori Browser work best on my Laptop/1000 Mhz/256 MB RAM with a Belkin PCMCIA Card. The Browser functions fast. The other small Linux, (except TinyCore), has problems with the old video card on the Laptop. The others are still functional. This Linux O/S has worked the best for me, and I have tried many. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easeltine (talkcontribs) 16:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, I am writing this from a Dell Inspiron 8000/1 GHz Coppermine/256 MB RAM SliTaz 4.0 from a Live CD. It works great, and makes this Article NOTABLE. I might even be considered a reliable 3rd Party!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.30.184 (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about?....

[edit]

What kind of high-brow language is "Nobility Challenge?" I can understand linux but I guess I'm not educated enough

in bureaucratic-speak to know what Nobility Challenge is. I say the lady doth protest too much.

Lets use simple language and get off our high horse so we can make a decision. Either way the world isn't going to end.

Could somebody get an Image up of the Desktop?

[edit]

That would be nice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.85.42 (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

I just removed two categories: Knoppix and Source based Linux distros.

If these categories were in fact accurate, then we need a source and a mention of it in the article (e.g. say that SliTaz is source- or Knoppix-based in the article, and back it up with a source). Otherwise, the article doesn't belong in those categories.

However, I am fairly certain both of these are inaccurate. SliTaz has its own package manager and the word "Knoppix" doesn't appear anywhere on their website.

Attys (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]