Talk:Slave Craton

Canada: Northwest Territories / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian Territories.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Slave Craton is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ryleymac.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Example

give me an example of a conglomerate rock ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conglomerate_(geology) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iancarine (talk • contribs) 13:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

This page is in mosts parts a verbatim copy of http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/mindep/synth_prov/slave/index_e.php. The copyright policy of Natural Resources Canada on http://www.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca/com/notiavis-eng.php is not in agreement with GFDL, thus it's a Copyright violation, isn't it? --Jo (talk) 12:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up, noting that both baby and bathwater may need to be discarded when it comes to copyvio. Dl2000 (talk) 03:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the remaining text still seems to be copyvio. I'm removing it. bobrayner (talk) 22:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]