Jump to content

Talk:Slate-colored hawk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Slate-colored Hawk)

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved per discussion. - GTBacchus(talk) 02:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]



– Both these pages were moved by Pvmoutside from the existing spelling, with synchronisation with the default standard for bird names, the IOC World Bird List cited, contrary to the principle that articles should not be changed from one national variety of English to the other, unless there are strong national ties to one variety, which these articles do not have (WP:ENGVAR). I moved the pages back, but this move was further reverted; I'd think keeping the original variety English wouldn't be controversial, but it's not perfectly clear this is so. —innotata 00:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment:Reason why article was originally moved, and then reverted was to conform with Wikiproject Bird's decision to follow IOC spelling. IOC spells both species without the "u" in color....Pvmoutside (talk) 01:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Could this be taking standardisation too far? It seems the IOC uses American English for all species in the Americas, while here we follow the original form in the article except where there is a strong national connection. I don't see any reason to change varieties here. —innotata 01:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert move (so support) per WP:ENGVAR. Both articles have had stable titles since creation I don't think IOC standardisation is a good enough reason to move away from that. Jenks24 (talk) 16:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The British language variant was clearly established at the creation of the article. The wholly admirable and commendable rationalisation policy of one WikiProject cannot take precedence over a fundamental WP principle. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.