Talk:Situational strength

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Skwwtr. Peer reviewers: Ngln92.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

This first section was can be used as introductory paragraphs, so I moved it up to the introduction section. Keep in mind this is just a suggested edit. It can be moved back to the main body of the article if desired. This article has a really good start. Good job. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expert help: what is needed

I did tidying up (e.g. references etc), but I am not knowledgeable in this area.

Could an expert check that the information is correct?

Also, I've put the Tinsley (2000) in "Further reading", as there was no mention in the article itself.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Content Gaps & Suggestions

Overall, a good start for an article. I have a couple suggestions:

First, in the first section, titled 'Contrasting strong and weak situations,' the only content is an example of a strong and a weak situation. There needs to be more definition of what those are and the difference between them. These will be elaborated more in the future, but they need to be well defined right there at the beginning. There were also no citations, there should be some indicating where the information being included is coming from.

Second, in the 'Modern conceptualization and empirical verification' section, I think the four facets should be put into their own section and discussed at length. These are important componenets of what indicates situational strength, and should each be elaborated on more to give the reader more clarity about them. Moreover, the definitions that exist for them need to be cited.

Mrgalbraith (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]