Talk:Treaty on Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance between China and the DPRK

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article title too long

I propose Sino–North Korean Treaty of Friendship, Co-operation, and Mutual Assistance; it's not the official name, but it's commonly used. Virtually no one would use the full title. I'm going to go ahead and make the move because this is a relatively obscure page, but please undo if you disagree toobigtokale (talk) 19:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also just saw that @Someone97816 had moved the page to its new name; note that the official name is not always recommended by Wikipedia, as per WP:OFFICIAL. If that were true, think of the articles for monarchs that have dozens of titles. We use common names, which works out well here because the common name is shorter. toobigtokale (talk) 20:00, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]