Jump to content

Talk:Simon Cellan Jones

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Simon Cellan-Jones)

No hyphen for James or Simon; but Rory uses one because CJ is not his birth surname.

[edit]

Neither James Cellan Jones nor his legitimate son Simon have a hyphen in their names. Rory is the illegitimate son of James. Because Rory is not a full member of the family, he uses a hyphen in his acquired (not birth) surname. This is all covered in James's memoir, Forsyte and Hindsight: Screen Directing for Pleasure and Profit. Softlavender (talk) 07:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This implies that Rory changed his surname or added the hyphen at some point, which is simply not true. On the contrary, his birth was registered in Hammersmith as Nicholas R Cellan-Jones. Nick Cooper (talk) 09:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, you are correct; none of this came out until James's obituary and then Rory's memoir. Sylvia Rich changed her surname via deed poll the day before Rory was born; although she still personally went by Sylvia Rich, it allowed her to give Rory his paternal grandparents' surname. Softlavender (talk) 14:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Simon Cellan Jones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skeleton infobox removal

[edit]

As per Wikipedia's Manual of Style re infoboxes: "The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia's reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia." Quis separabit? 17:15, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]