Talk:Siege of Kamacha/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Need place of pub for Rochow.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Disambiguate Amida and clarify who the Abbasids were in the lede. Adding Caliphate should be enough to tell people that they were Muslims.

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Hello Sturmvogel, and thanks for taking the time! I've made the suggested changes, but could I have some feedback on how the article reads to someone who (presumably) knows nothing on the subject? Is context lacking, would you like me to explain something better or in more detail? Cheers, Constantine ✍ 07:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think that you've done a pretty good job orienting the reader to the context of the siege. There's a map, you give the date in the lede as well as the participants.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]