Jump to content

Talk:Siddharth (actor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Siddharth Narayan)

Age

[edit]

Siddarth is 34 years old as of 2013. He was born in 1979. He even tweeted his age couple of years back as 32. http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/news/2013/siddharth-narayan-celebrate-34th-birthday-photos-107771.html Not sure why his birth year is listed as 1983! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gowiki1342 (talkcontribs) 04:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:34, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please site source for the age of Siddharth in the talk page.--Dwaipayanc 10:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find that info online, and I've been sitting back watching as anons change it back and forth. There may be non-English sources with his age. Zora 10:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is still going on. It's absurd, given we know he was in college in 1997. Hornplease 08:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I realy don't agree with Siddharth's age.I am sure he was not born in the year 1979.The source for his age is from one of the fans website and I am sure it was created to manipulate his age.

Siddharths DOB is 17/4/1979 and this has been confirmed from his record at KMC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.87.52.48 (talk) 17:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Siddharth was my senior at DAV Gopalapuram. I was born 07/19/1980. So, hell yes he was born in 1979. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.63.122.4 (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I thought Siddharth was only 28. I know for sure he is not almost 40.

I requested IP protection for the page, but it was turned down. I wish I could do more, but I don't want to get into a continuous edit war here. Perhaps someone else could request protection? I researched the DOB which does appear to be 1979. Sorry, but I am not an admin and can do no more. VMS Mosaic (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The birth year of Siddharth is mentioned as 1971 in the bio template, but as 1981 in the introductory (first) line. --68.193.2.168 (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listas

[edit]

Mr.Siddharth does not use any surname. Source : twitter.com/actor_siddharth Kkavitha (talk) 07:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Kkavitha[reply]

Siddharth was also well known in his Alma mater - SP Jain for being CNBC Young Manager award in 2000 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.42.187.254 (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Siddharth Does not use any Surname. Hence the Page Title has to be changed from "Siddharth Narayan" to "Siddharth". Source: Twitter/Actor_Siddharth where he tweeted: On 3rd Jan'10 "I don't use a surname. Its just siddharth. Works for me:) some ignorant journo named me siddharth narayan after RDB. i hate that name,coz its not my name! can we find a way to stop it being used!!" On 27th Jan'10 " Make them stop calling me by these awful incorrect names...aaaaaaaaahhhhhh! 10 films and my name is a mystery. Sad. Its just Siddharth!! " This is a clear proof. Immediate action to be taken by Wiki and correct the mistake. A CELEBRITY should not be addressed with a WRONG NAME, ..SAD Neerajaakunuri (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the film Striker

[edit]

I believe this to be changed accordingly as the movie is released now. He and his fans are awaiting the release of his second Bollywood movie Striker, which is about the life of a carrom player

I am new to wiki edit section. Not sure how to do it for semi-protected articles, hence this section on the talk page.

New Movie

[edit]

The Siddharth's new movie is "Anaganaga O Dheerudu", but the last paragraph mentions it as "Hyderabad". Can it be corrected? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.77.173.59 (talk) 14:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!!! Laxmisrikanth (talk) 20:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC) LS[reply]

his real name

[edit]

He tweeted, that the article doesn't recite his correct name. Any idea of it?--Wangond (talk) 20:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siddharth.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Siddharth.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 22:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siddharh.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Siddharh.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. I think the consensus may be to move the article, however not as proposed. If moved, Siddharth (actor) is one option but since he is not the only actor, this could be a problem. But that could be addressed with a change of the dab in the future if needed. I'll probably list this with Siddharth (actor) as the proposed target as opposed to resisting this discussion after this is closed. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Siddharth NarayanSiddharth – In his tweets on 21st December, the actor clearly stated that he does not have a surname. His name is just Siddharth. Escalator2heaven (talk) 08:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source plz. X.One SOS 09:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Even if he has a surname, it's not necessary as he is popularly known as "Siddharth" and is credited in movies with that name Don't know about the Telugu movies. Commander (Ping me) 09:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I've been meaning to submit this move request for a while, every source we have in the article and movie credits are as "Siddharth" and Wikipedia seems to be the only one using this form of his name. —SpacemanSpiff 09:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is another actor called Siddharth Koirala, brother of Manisha Koirala. Lots of other people have the same name. Then why should this be moved to "Siddharth"? X.One SOS 09:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change support to move to Siddharth (actor) per Noetica's valid comments. However, it is not for Wikipedia to force fit names for subjects because their name doesn't fit our schema, therefore the current title is quite absurd indeed. —SpacemanSpiff
  • Oppose. Has anyone gone to the trouble of looking at Siddharth as it now stands? It is a redirect to Siddhartha. This is because "Siddharth" is virtually just a spelling variant (or a transcription variant) of "Siddhartha". In Sanskrit and related Indic languages a final short "a" is assumed for a word that ends in a consonant. Hence we see "yog" as a variant of "yoga", "Karm" (name of a film, on Wikipedia) as a variant of "karma", "anand" (a heavily populated DAB page) for "ananda", and so on.
The DAB page Siddhartha includes many people called "Siddhartha", and many named with the variant "Siddharth" – including the person dealt with in the present article. It is a principal name of Gautama Buddha. It would be a very strange thing to appropriate the name, bare and unqualified, for an article about a 32-year-old actor from the south of India. It is reasonable to think that two dozen centuries of Buddhism have a natural claim to primacy, yes?
 ♥ NoeticaTea? 09:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Partial oppose - Per Noetica. Lots of other people have the name, including another actor. Running through pageview stats ;
  • Siddharth Narayan has 54000 views in this month. [1]
  • Siddharth Koirala has 1800 views. [2]
Hence, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, out of the two actors, this one is more visited and of higher interest and importance. Siddharth Koirala is not only an actor, but equally an active politician. So, I am proposing to move this to "Siddharth (actor)". Would be helpful if others again reviewed their opinions. X.One SOS 11:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, It is usually recommended that we don't use just visit counts as reasoning for redirects and page moves. I suggest Siddharth Narayan stay the way it is because of ambiguity with the other Siddharth. Just for the record, we have a similar problem with Sathyan (actor) and Sathyan Sivakumar. Perhaps the final consensus here could help those two pages out as well. EelamStyleZ talk 19:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. I consider my nomination here to be the same as a relisting. The purpose was to gather input on what the consensus appeared to be. So I have no problem doing the close. If there are questions, I'm wiling to back away. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]



Siddharth NarayanSiddharth (actor) – Based on the first move discussion that proposed target may not be the best, this alternative seems to have a good amount of support, but he is not the only actor. Rather then relisting the old discussion with a target that lacks support, I elected to open this new discussion. If you comment, do read the discussion that was just closed. Vegaswikian (talk) 17:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per previous opinion. X.One SOS 07:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support – per nom Commander (Ping me) 08:40, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - His twitter account states his fathers name as Suryanarayan. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siddharth Narayan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Siddharth Narayan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siddharth (Actor).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Siddharth (Actor).jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Siddharth (Actor).jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Actor Siddharth, Kadhalil Sodhappuvadu Yeppadi.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Actor Siddharth, Kadhalil Sodhappuvadu Yeppadi.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Actor Siddharth, Kadhalil Sodhappuvadu Yeppadi.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 25 June 2013

[edit]

The movies NH4 and Udhayam are not connected properly. 122.167.127.38 (talk) 01:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question: I see what you mean, in that the wikilinks don't go to the right place - Udhayam, NH4.
But I'm confused - the earlier entry indicates this is one movie - Udhayam NH4 - so I'm not sure how to "fix" this - as you say movies.
Can you explain further - sorry if I'm missing something obvious here. Begoontalk 01:32, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Siddharth (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:09, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2024

[edit]

Change "Siddharth married Aditi" to "Siddharth is engaged to Aditi" Punishrr (talk) 10:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]