Talk:2010 Sibu by-election
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Sibu by-election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
2010 Sibu by-election has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sibu by-election, 2010/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Adabow (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Prose/MoS
[edit]{{Infobox election}}
should be included.- 'Nomination of candidates' section: after being mentioned once, Wong Ho Leng should be referred to by his surname, not his given name.
- If I can pop in on this one - I think "Wong" is the correct reference. Being a Chinese name, Wong is his family name. That's how he is referred to in Malaysian media, see [1] and [2] --Mkativerata (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, right. In that case then, in the first sentence in the penultimate paragraph of the 'Aftermath' section, he is mentioned as 'Ho Leng'. If 'Wong' is how he should be referred to as, then this sentence needs rectifying. Adabow (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- 'Election campaign issues' section: there is a bit of jargon that is unexplained, namely 'Sarawak OCCI SAC II Huzir Mohamed' – who is this person, is there a WP article about them (if so, provide a wikilink), what do the acronyms mean?
Also explain 'RM18mil'.Reading on, I have realised that this is a currency, but it should be provided with a link the first time it is used, and 'million' should be spelt out in full, ie RM18 million. This should be kept consistent throughout the article (but only linking the first times it is used). - 'Results' section: The results table should be in descending numerical order, ie winner up the top
- 'See also' section: Underscores should be replaced by spaces, and the links should be piped and reworded to avoid the '#' displaying. I note that both links are for the same article; are they both necessary?
References
[edit]- Citation 1 is dead, all others are live.
Broad/focussed
[edit]- Pretty broad, without going into minuscule details
Neutral
[edit]- Viewpoints represented equally and fairly
Stable
[edit]- No vandalism or unsettled disussions
Images
[edit]- Sibuby-election.jpg is missing a description, I have notified the uploader on their talk page.
Final comments
[edit]There are some minor changes necessary, I will place the review on hold for seven days, awaiting improvements. Good luck improving the article! Adabow (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- I am satisfied with the improvements made to the article, and will now pass it. Congratulations! Adabow (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sibu by-election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110906083741/http://semak.spr.gov.my/spr/laporan/5_KedudukanAkhir.php to http://semak.spr.gov.my/spr/laporan/5_KedudukanAkhir.php
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121012193138/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/4/24/nation/6125445&sec=nation to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/4/24/nation/6125445&sec=nation
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)