Talk:Short Type 184

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Did the torpedo from the 184 sink the ship?

Hi MilborneOne

I have come across a reference claiming that the ship was actually sunk by a torpedo, but not from the 184 but from a submarine in the area at the same time. Have a look at the reference in Short Brothers and see what you think. TraceyR 00:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More data

The German wiki site goes into more detail: apparently the submarine was HMS E14 (odd name?) and had alreay attacked the Turkish ship, causing it to run aground. The Naval Museum in Yeovil (?) might have more infomation. TraceyR 01:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the wording to remove the fact it sank the ship as you are right, please refer to the article on the mother ship HMS Ben-my-Chree. It still was the first torpedo attack.MilborneOne 20:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not so fast!! There is no reference on the HMS Ben-my-Chree article to any independent verification. I think that this one will run and run until the record assigning the "kill" to the one or the other is referenced. In terms of numbers of Google hits, the S.184 has it, but that is no basis for attributing it definitively. The German Wiki entry for the S.184 is more detailed than the English one but is very poor on references. I'm also not convinced that it was the first torpedo attack, but that's another story! TraceyR 08:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article just says it attacked it with a torpedo it does not make a "kill" claim.MilborneOne 12:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is clear. I'm just amazed at the number of places on the web where the "kill" is claimed for the S.184 - there are so many to cite but so far I haven't come across anything definitive. Perhaps the Fleet Air Arm museum can help. I'll send them an email. TraceyR 15:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Short Type 184. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318172634/http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/milestones-of-flight/british_military/1916.html to http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/milestones-of-flight/british_military/1916.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]