Talk:Shiva hypothesis

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Shiva hypothesis is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Shiva Hypothesis

I would suggest, for clarity's sake, improving "gravitational disturbances caused by the Earth crossing the plane of the Milky Way" by substituting "Solar System" in place of Earth. Seems to me that could cause confusion. KyurioZT 03:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question about the terminology. Would you term this a theory. As far as I know you need to have a lot of e.g. experiments as proof before something is called a scientific "theory". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.195.81 (talk) 09:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By informal convention, yes, but there is no formal definition of theory, except it should be statements/models that are testable and verifiable/falsifiable. By some informal convention "hypotheses" refer to such statements/models that are formulated in order to explain something otherwise unexplicable, while theories are former hypotheses that have been tested and not yet failed. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 17:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this notable?

I found three ADSABS links regarding this weak Shiva Hypothesis – which is very few indeed – it is notable just by the skin of its teeth. If the interest on this hypothesis is not increasing very much in the future, I would estimate it will lose its notability. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 17:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this original?

This theory had been around for nearly 2 decades prior to Rampino & Haggerty naming it 'Shiva'. Rampino's omission of a citation to the original 1976 Napier and Clube paper may have been just an oversight but he was certainly aware of it. And, Rampino does appear to report this as his own original work in the popular press and on television. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZweibelZwobble (talk • contribs) 21:05, 14 December 2016‎

Requested move 26 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 05:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shiva Hypothesis → Shiva hypothesis – Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:CAPS, particularly MOS:SCIMATH. Lithopsian (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.