Talk:Rashid bin Khalifa Al Khalifa
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Shaikh Rashid bin Khalifa Al Khalifa)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rashid bin Khalifa Al Khalifa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
facebook link
[edit]Rashid al khalifa's facebook link has been changed to "Al Khalifa Family." It was originally about tha artist. Can someone revert it to the artist's page? Also the someone has vandalised it which i have already removed.Tokistar (talk) 06:24, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- I can't see a FB link given, but there shouldn't be one anyway. The article is not for promotion of the artist; it's an encyclopaedia article. Span (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Spanglej this is the link and it used to be his wikipedia interest page Shaikh Rashid Bin Khalifa Al Khalifa but now it has changed to this http://www.facebook.com/pages/Shaikh-Rashid-bin-Khalifa-Al-Khalifa/144394402240324Tokistar (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
External links
[edit]Additional links removed. They breach WP:EL - external links isn't a dump for any mention on the web connected to the subject! However there may be useful info which can be worked into the article. Here they are for posterity: