Talk:Sensual Seduction

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sensual Seduction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip-hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip-hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip-hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip-hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip-hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip-hopHip-hop
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Title change.

No. No, no, no. The title should be "Sexual Eruption."--Josh (talk) 03:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's obvious "Sensual Seduction" is the clean version. Nowhere on Snoop's site does it say that it's the official title. It just links to iTunes where it clearly says it's the clean, edited version. Spellcast (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)by DJ AR SHAH[reply]

talk box/auto-tune usage

Hey. OK- on the page for the SD album which contains this song- it says Snoop uses a talk box, whereas in the text for 'sexual eruption' it says snoop uses an auto-tune device. These are separate devices, with different articles in the wikipedia- which one is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Streamingfish (talk • contribs) 08:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's an auto-tune. The XXL ref says "Snoop breaks out the Auto-Tune effect on the first single from Ego Trippin'". Spellcast (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://suckerfreeblog.mtv.com/2007/12/03/snoop-dogg-on-his-sensual-seduction-throwback-video/ is quoting Snoop Dogg as saying: "[...]I actually showed the Talkbox because what T-Pain is doing is not Talkbox. His is Auto-Tune, which is you sing and then they make your voice sound right in the computer. What I did was I played the notes through the Talkbox, that’s why I have the tube in there. And that tube that I’m using is a piece that goes to the keyboard which Roger Troutman was known for." so I would assume that he is using Talkbox and not Auto-tune as written in the article. 80.162.135.174 (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as shown by that link definately and the tube in the music video definately 100% a talkbox.Parralax (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

who knows something about the particular video? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.208.83.247 (talk) 02:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title..again?!?

Ok. The actual song and single are both "Sexual Eruption". "Sensual Seduction" is simply the censored version. track listing is Sexual Eruption, and Dogg's official website calls the single as well "Sexual Eruption". Also the cover from his website says "Sexual Eruption". It's sold as Sexual Eruption and also Sensual Seduction, being the "clean version", so the thing that is was originally titled as "Sexual Eruption" and then got changed is false. And why did the page get moved when the was consensus on keeping it "Sexual Eruption"? No one even proposed it. Udonknome (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2008 (UTC) N AR SHAH is KinG Of Dj's[reply]

porno?

Wasn't this song made into a video that was actual pornography? 161.185.151.150 (talk) 20:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hustler made this into a video

Sexual Eruption was made into a porno music video by Hustler. With much of the video being graphic sex. It still stars Snoop but, he does not participate in any of the sex. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.160.18 (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 08:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual Eruption → Sensual Seduction – This song is mainly known for its censored version. The censored version generates ±800,000 results, while the explicit version ±200,000. I Wanna Love You (Akon song) and Tonight (I'm Lovin' You) are two precedents of this RM. This is a WP:COMMONAME matter, not a WP:CENSOR one. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 20:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm very skeptical of the accuracy of ghits numbers (in the case of web searches), even without considering the problem of false positives. But a search of nytimes.com gives 5 results for "sensual seduction" (not counting 2 false positives), and 1 for "sexual eruption". A Google News search gives 816 results for "sensual seduction", and 363 for "sexual eruption" (though again, there are some false positives, especially in the first case). Sources that use "sexual eruption" seem more likely to also mention the "sensual seduction" title. So, in all, I can believe that the name of the "clean" version that went to radio is more recognizable, and used more in RS - though not by a wide margin. (And the examples mentioned by Tbhotch in the nom show that, in such cases, there's precedent for using the "clean" name as the title.) Colin M (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.