Talk:Sex as a biological variable
Appearance
A fact from Sex as a biological variable appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Mx. Granger (talk) 20:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that research incorporating sex as a biological variable enhances the rigor and reproducibility of results? Source: "Sex as a biological variable (SABV) is a key part of the new National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiative to enhance reproducibility through rigor and transparency...Having greater awareness of the roles that sex and gender play in health and disease will help the entire medical scientific enterprise achieve more clarity and enhance rigor and reproducibility.[1], "To produce precise and reproducible results applicable for both men and women, sex should be considered as an important biological variable from basic and preclinical research." [2]
- ALT1:... that the European Commission, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the National Institutes of Health have all instituted sex as a biological variable policies to enhance scientific rigor and reproducibility? Source: "Recently, funding organizations including the European Commission (EC), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) put efforts into influencing researchers to integrate sex and gender in the whole study processes from hypothesis to publication." "To produce precise and reproducible results applicable for both men and women, sex should be considered as an important biological variable from basic and preclinical research." [3]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Brenda Banks (animator)
- Comment: Earwig report shows public domain text which has been tagged as such in the references.
Created by TJMSmith (talk). Self-nominated at 14:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC).
- This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and the article is neutral. I rephrased a couple of sentences which were too close to the source but otherwise detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
How, just how?
[edit]The influence of the Y-chromosome on the body is clear, even to a layman like me. The history of "Sex as NOT a biological variable" is much more interesting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.173.226.152 (talk • contribs)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- C-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class women's health articles
- Low-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 184 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- C-Class Biology articles
- Low-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles