Jump to content

Talk:Seton Falls Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

[edit]

Crimes

[edit]

Other

[edit]

Books

[edit]

1967 report

[edit]

@RoySmith: The source actually doesn't say which community board made the report. It says During a Community Planning Board field review of blueprints for a recreation area in Seton Falls in 1967, public officials recognized the degraded condition of the park and noted that the "park area, if cleaned and cleared could become a beautiful woodland of rest and recreation in what will soon be a built-up and developed area.' The source of the source is given as Frank Andrews, Bronx Community Planning District 11, Parks and Recreation Committee Report (New York: n.p., 1967), That's quite strange. I'm not sure why CB11 members would be interested in CD12 territory. I'll look for other sources for this. epicgenius (talk) 22:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Epicgenius, I've got some emails in to the district managers at both CB11 and CB12. So far, all I've found out is that their records probably don't go back that far :-( The note at the bottom of page 141 in "The Ecological History of an Urban Park" says, "Community Planning District 11". I don't know if a Community Planning District is/was the same thing as a Community Board. I'm going down that rabbit hole now :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to mainspace

[edit]

@RoySmith: I think we should move this page to mainspace, if you're ready. I filled out the description and history of the park to the best of my knowledge. There are a few gaps in the timeline that I couldn't pin down, but I think this is a usable article now. epicgenius (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Epicgenius, Go for it. I think it's more than usable; great job. Just wish I could have contributed more. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
RoySmith, it's all right. I'm sure there's lots I didn't cover. Anyway, I nominated both articles jointly at DYK. Feel free to come up with more hooks. epicgenius (talk) 19:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Epicgenius, My personal preference tends more towards the short and pithy, not to mention quirky, end of the spectrum. I'll see what I can come up with that doesn't mention dead bodies :-) I'll probably be by there again soon, so I'll see if I can get some more photos, and Givans Creek Woods, too. Was it you that was looking for skate parks? -- RoySmith (talk) 19:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
RoySmith, I think the skate parks request came from someone else. The more photos, the better. Thanks for helping out with the article. epicgenius (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)
  • ... that a waterfall along Rattlesnake Creek in Seton Falls Park was created as part of the country estate of the Seton family in what is now New York City? Source: Loeb, Robert E. (1989). "The Ecological History of an Urban Park". Forest & Conservation History. Oxford University Press (OUP). 33 (3): 138.
    • ALT1:... that the only remaining above-ground section of New York City's Rattlesnake Creek is in Seton Falls Park, where a man-made waterfall is a remnant of a former mill? Source: Kadinsky, Sergey (2016). Hidden Waters of New York City: A History and Guide to 101 Forgotten Lakes, Ponds, Creeks, and Streams in the Five Boroughs. Countryman Press. p. 72.

Created by RoySmith (talk) and Epicgenius (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 19:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • "Rattlesnake Creek was named after the abundant rattlesnakes that" should be reworded. QPQs not done. ALT0 isn't that interesting, ALT1 is better but perhaps should say "only remaining above-ground" section. CMD (talk) 10:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"There was once a large rattlesnake population in the area [or in the northeast Bronx], after which the creek was named." would fit in the current paragraph structure. CMD (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1, as the more interesting hook. CMD (talk) 17:29, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, I came by to promote ALT1, but I find the hook wording confusing with "remaining" and "remnant" in the same sentence; not sure which is a remnant of which. Perhaps splitting it into two hooks would yield better hook wording. Yoninah (talk) 15:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Epicgenius: I think your single-article hooks are going to fare better on the main page than the double ones. ALTR2 sounds scary enough and ALTS1 is also hooky. Both hooks are verified and cited inline. Rest of review per CMD. Good to go on separate days.
  • Note to promoter: Please keep this template open until both hooks are promoted. Thank you. Yoninah (talk) 20:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Seton_Falls_Park&oldid=1207481767"