Talk:Central All-Indonesian Workers Organization/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do enjoy reviewing Indonesia articles. I'll do this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	See below
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See below
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Per definition. Only constructive edits
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images have issues
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

Comments

General

The lede certainly needs to be expanded to provide a very brief history of the organisation.

1a

I see several one sentence paragraphs — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see very little point in checking the prose when the lede needs expansion. Please see to that first. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2a

I'm seeing a huge whitespace in the references because of the box.

2b

What makes marxist.org a reliable source?

6a

File:SOBSI-congress-Malang-1947.jpg needs proof of publication. Note that it is PD 50 years after publication (25 if published before 1971), not the date of realisation.
File:Sobsi-rally.jpg - Same as above.
File:Pidato-blokzijl-speaking-at-1947-sobsi-meeting.jpg - Same as above.

Failing article, issues unaddressed after nearly 10 days. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]