Talk:Self-reflection

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Self-reflection article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Philosophy: Mind Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of mind

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tsrealestatepro.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

"Anthropos sometimes is explained as a compound of aner and ops (genitive opos) "eye, face;" so literally "he who has the face of a man." The change of -d- to -th- is difficult to explain; perhaps it is from some lost dialectal variant, or the mistaken belief that there was an aspiration sign over the vowel in the second element (as though *-dhropo-), which mistake might have come about by influence of common verbs such as horao "to see." from [[1]] suggests a possibility, but I don't have any published sources. The current page says Anthropos comes from mycenean greek and means or could be interpreted as "low eyed". I havent found a source that supports this yet. 68.58.218.88 (talk) 19:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cogito ergo sum

This might relate to a distinction without a difference, but I added Cogito ergo sum ~René Descartes, 1647
~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 00:33, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A very weak article

A largely unsourced, non-erudite hodgepodge. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still is today. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:47, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aristotle wrote what?

I would be interested to know where the phrase "ζῶον λόγον ἔχον" exists outside of Heidegger's "Being and Time"! Miimno (talk) 10:38, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears [[2]] in Hermeneutics by Andrzej Wiercinski. He lists the source in a footnote, as Aristotle's Politics 1253a 9-10 (trans B. Jowett) from The Complete Works of Aristotle by Johnathan Barnes (1984) "Nature as we often say, makes nothing in vain, and man is the only animal with the gift of speech".68.58.218.88 (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social Comparison Theory

Obviously this article is missing a world of information on this particular comment. However, if i were to suggest something to help with keeping it up-to-date, social comparison theory is a vital piece of our modern day that is encased in the topic of self-reflection. As this dilemma within the modern generations becomes more and more detrimental to their social skills, image, and esteem; We can see self-reflection is the majority of what adolescents and young adults truly worry about. The included link is an article discussing the effects of social comparison on social media and its outcomes. [3]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886915004079 Cablamalam (talk) 23:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Cablamalam (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]