Talk:Sector mass spectrometer

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mass spectrometry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mass spectrometry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Mass spectrometryWikipedia:WikiProject Mass spectrometryTemplate:WikiProject Mass spectrometryMass spectrometry articles

Pictures Needed

This is the sort of article where diagrams are sorely needed in order to give the worded descriptions meaning. Perpendicular fields and their resultant forces in the Theory section and geometries in the Classic Geometry section would be good places to start. Also, the descriptions should follow the diagrams, so the diagrams need to use notation that is easy to indicate using Wikipedia's interface. I cannot myself do the diagrams since I do not have expert knowledge in this field nor do I have artistic skill, but hopefully people who do will read this and help out. --BBUCommander (talk) 03:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

original publication

The correct citation for the Mattauch-Herzog type MS should be: "J. Mattauch, R. Herzog, Über einen neuen Massenspektrographen, Z. Physik 89, 786-795 (1934)". There are also pictures of the original geometry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.79.113.50 (talk) 09:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the article to Sector mass spectrometer, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:21, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sector instrument → Double-focusing mass spectrometer – I tried to make this move, but it was rejected, apparently because five years ago the page was moved from 'double-focusing...' to the present one. That was a bad move. The article is almost entirely about double-focusing mass spectrometers, including types that are not actually sector instruments. This title needs to be changed back! Radiogenic (talk) 03:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment my first thought with this title was sector (instrument), a very different instrument -- 70.51.46.146 (talk) 05:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment All sector mass spectrometers are not double focusing. A calutron for example is a sector instrument but is not a double-focusing mass spectrometer. Or this isotope ratio mass spectrometer.[1] I would support a move of sector instrument to sector mass spectrometer and an expansion of double-focusing mass spectrometer to include that specific kind of sector instrument. Only the former requires a move over redirect. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.