Talk:Scofield Reservoir

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Scofield Reservoir is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Utah Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Mid-importance).

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge Scofield Dam into Scofield Reservoir. -- DeFaultRyan (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that we could merge Scofield Dam into this article (including a redirect) and create a single, well-crafted, complete article from these two. We could even redirect Scofield State Park to here and put information relevant to the state park status into this article. I've also noticed that the majority of the information on Scofield Dam is already on Scofield Reservoir. Having two serparate articles looks a little redundant right now.

Any objections? DeFaultRyan (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. This is just what should happen. Be my guest. Ntsimp (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rating (WP Lakes assessment)

I have made this a C-class, alongside the WP Utah rating, as though the article has a sufficient amount of content to reach B, it needs much more inline citations that are properly done with the {{citation}} template. -- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 21:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Scofield Reservoir/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

After seeing that no article existed for Scofield Reservoir. I've created this page. I'm trying to follow the Wikiproject Lakes template as best as I can, but any help would be appreciated Jaromhuff21 (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)